🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were large groups of ballots added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year backed Zohran this year. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.